I happened to meet the nephew of Manfred Reyes Villa, who happened to be, like I think I said before, the 4-time mayor of Cochabamba and also the previous governor of the Cochabamba state, and who ran against the current president, Evo Morales, in 2010, but was the runner-up. The friend who's coming up to the States in December (but actually can't make it to Urbana after all... the wedding she's going to the States for is unfortunately during that time) said that he lost because he made a fatal error that basically went against all that he stood for.
Carlos (the nephew) agreed, and said that his uncle sided with the previous president, thinking it would ensure him victory. But it did the opposite. However, Manfred is currently in the U.S. on political asylum and will be running for president again in 2014 (for the term 2015 - 2020). Evo's kinda been out to get him, as I read this interview that Carlos posted on Facebook about how Evo's got his name up on Interpol or something, is trying to say that he's committed a bunch of crimes when he hasn't, and is convincing people to believe that Manfred is in hiding from Interpol.
Anyway, my friend said that had he won, he probably would've been one of the best presidents that Bolivia has ever seen. I talked to a variety of people about what they thought of Reyes Villa, and opinions were mixed. We'll see what happens in 2014.
Why do people like Evo? Well, for one, he is of indigenous origin (specifically Aymara [one of my new favorite words, haha], also one of the three official languages of Bolivia [Spanish, Quechua, and Aymara]), and since Bolivia is majority indigenous, many people can identify with him.
There are things that don't add up, though, like how Evo has been apparently able to do a bunch of things that he shouldn't really be educated enough to do (I think he didn't finish the equivalent of high school. Or at least he definitely did not get a college degree). Some people feel like it's because he's actually really smart, but others say that it's really that Evo is just the face to make people happy, while it's his vice president that's running the show.
Álvaro García Linera is the VP. Carlos said he's never met Evo (he says he never wants to, and I guess that makes sense why. haha, although he said his dog has met him. Apparently, before Evo was anything, and when his uncle was the mayor, Carlos' dog went up and knocked him over when Evo was visiting their house. Gave him paw marks on his chest too. Carlos was apparently just upstairs in his room), but he's met Álvaro. He said he likes him, to which I was like, really? And then he was like, well, he's nice.
I replied, "But isn't he the one who's like running the show?"
Carlos answered, "Yeah... oh, well, yeah, I guess he's not that great. He's a terrorist."
To which I was like, Oh. I thought it was just American over-sensitivity (Carlos was born in the States, lived in La Paz, Bolivia for like 7 years and graduated from an international high school there, and now goes to college in the States, where he's a senior) about terrorism, but looking at Wikipedia, Álvaro was actually arrested, convicted, and thrown in jail for terrorism. Well.
Anyway, I also learned from someone in Cochabamba that Álvaro was also tutored by the previous President before Evo. Which made me think... really, now? Really? So all those posters and talk about Evo being the change... it's actually the graffiti that's more accurate when it says, "Evo la misma mierda (Evo the same s**t)."
During my second week or so, I had a nice long conversation with a girl from the church I went to down there as we were waiting for another person from the same church to accompany us to La Cancha, the big street market in Cochabamba (it was my first time going, and I'd kinda asked them to go with me since all the volunteers said not to go alone since I'd get lost). Leslie, the girl, told me all about the suckiness of the situation of Bolivia.
For one, one of Bolivia's airplane companies, Aerosur, had just declared bankruptcy in the past couple of days and was shutting down. Which kinda sucked for everyone, since some volunteers had plane tickets they needed to change immediately, and Aerosur wasn't about to refund that money (well, since they had declared bankruptcy, I think now they could get the money back). In fact, I orginally had my plane tickets with Aerosur, but then they cancelled all international flights before I left, and this was a week before I was about to go. But fortunately, Rice's travel agent noticed, scrambled to get me a comparably great deal with BoA, Bolivia's other airline. Mac I think went on to file something against Aerosur to get Rice's money back. Glad I didn't have to deal with any of that, haha.
But anyway, BoA is not just one of Bolivia's other airline. It's now Bolivia's only airline. Which happens to be owned by the government. Leslie told me that in actuality, the government could have saved Aerosur. It could have also saved another airline that had recently declared bankruptcy in the last couple of years too. But it didn't.
Why is that? Well, one can speculate that it's because now that the government has a monopoly on the airplanes going in and out of the country, it can jack up those prices. It can also increase drug trafficking to other countries... all wonderful things for the people of Bolivia, I'm sure.
That made me pissed and sad... but I think apparently some wealthy American or some foreigner at least gave Aerosur a few million USD to start back up again. When I was at the airport in July, though, Aerosur's kiosks were still empty. Might be a while before they can get back on their feet.
Maybe this is just one reason why people say that Bolivia has one of the most corrupt governments in the Western Hemisphere.
Leslie continued to tell me about how some people are just gaining so much money from things like drug trafficking, and then hiding their money by buying all this real-estate and constructing huge buildings, as she pointed to some finished buildings or some being constructed around us. Evo thus tells people that Bolivia is in great economic shape--just look at all these new buildings! But in reality, it's just a facade. It's not sustainable, and nor is it an indication that the poor are getting better. Although I suppose more buildings at least means more jobs and eventually more business. But at the same time, that whole, rich are getting richer thing, and not much else happening.
Leslie did talk about how she wanted to help out her country when she finishes her architecture degree. She already has a degree I think in some kind of engineering, and so she wants to use all of that to help develop her country. It was so nice to be able to talk to some Christians there, and hear their passion and trust in God during all of this. =) At the same time, though, she said that if Evo gets reelected, she might move out of the country for a while and study/work somewhere else.
Evo shouldn't get reelected, though, because he's already on his second term, and Bolivia's constitution only allows him to serve two terms. Unless... oh,wait... yeah, you guessed it, he's trying to change the constitution so he can get another term. Wonderful.
I think Manfred has a good chance of winning the election in 2014. Carlos told me that if his uncle does become president, I'll be able to meet him! Yay! =) (he also said that I'm one of his top three favorite other volunteers... =) This was probably helped by my starstruckness and infatuation on him, which ended up with me paying him much more attention, lol) Part of me kinda wants Manfred to wait another term... because, well, if he wins two terms in a row, then that's 2015- 2025, and by 2022, I've just finished my residency if all goes well, and gotten my MD and MPH (really considering getting an MPH now, btw! Man, how Bolivia has changed me), and am not ready to be useful enough to help out. But if it were 2020 - 2030 or something, now then at least I'd have a few years under my belt. Or maybe if Evo does change the constitution to include three terms and loses, 2015-2030. Or 2020 - 2035 if Evo changes it and wins. Then again, by 2035, Manfred would be 81. D=
Carlos said he might go work for his uncle--he's not sure. But the people who worked for his uncle before said that it would be good, he'd have a lot of connections after all. I realize this is rather far-fetched and crazy, but if Carlos did end up working for the government and his uncle was the president, maybe I could work for them too. Just a thought. So a degree in Public Health would be pretty useful there.
Anyway, I think that's all that I wanted to say on the political situation so far. I guess I'll be tuning in at the end of 2014 for the elections... seeing what happens to Bolivia.
I also feel slightly bad that I kind of care a bit more about the elections in Bolivia than I do in my own country, the U.S. But at the same time, it's probably because I kind of have a more substantial connection with one of the candidates.
alsoo... slightly unrelated, but Manfred was the mayor when the Christ statue in my profile pic was being completed, and I guess he helped fund a lot of it to get it completed. There's this plaque there around the statue that has his name in big letters at the top, haha. Largest one in the world (if you don't include the crown on the one in Poland)... kinda crazy.
Tuesday, August 14, 2012
Tuesday, August 7, 2012
Sunday, August 5, 2012
Loewenstern Fellowship Envelope #5
Open after you have had a particularly productive day related to your service
Saturday, August 4, 2012
Wednesday, August 1, 2012
This is addressed to no one in particular, but actually thoughts that I've had for the past year or so.
Sometimes I wish I were Side-A, same-sex relationship affirming.
Not because I have some guy I want to be in a relationship with. But because I wish to teach other Christians how to love those who do affirm same-sex relationships. I want to show them so badly that, in actuality, not every person who has a different theology than you on homosexuality is automatically evil and driven by their desires.
This has never happened to my knowledge, but I would hate it if someone were to shun those who are Side A and then tout me as an example of how gay people should be. That would infuriate me to no end.
While that has never actually happened, I do sometimes get an inkling of it. That those exact actions and thoughts are going through that person's mind. I tend to give them the benefit of the doubt because heck, it's probably confusing for them too. But still.
Don't uphold Side B theology and then ostracize the LGBT community if people don't conform to it. Just because you've happened to find this nice little niche of people that secure your previous beliefs about homosexuality does not entitle you to go on your merry way of not getting to know and love your neighbors.
Don't share about me if you're just gonna leave it at, "Oh, what do I think about gay people? Well, I have a gay friend. He's Christian, gay, and celibate from same-sex relationships. I wish more gay people would be like him."
I remember once thinking about making a stipulation that people can share that I'm gay and Christian with anyone that they choose, but only under the condition that they leave out the part about being celibate from same-sex relationships, and if the person they're talking to want more details about how being gay and Christian works, well, ask me. I'm more than happy to talk.
But I do find myself saying I'm gay and Christian, and then immediately following up with, "But I'm celibate from same-sex relationships!" I don't want to "lose my credibility" by not following up with that. At the same time, maybe it's the sadist in me, but sometimes I want to just leave that part about being celibate out so I can watch people squirm as their beliefs and thoughts about interacting with gay people are challenged. And to see just how they'd react.
I've grown to think that this gay, celibate Christian is a stock thing that I can say in Christian communities and everyone's fine and goes along with it. But in Bolivia, a couple of people I told had serious issues with it. The fact that I even identify as gay they felt was not appropriate or good.
I suppose I am thankful in these cases that I am Side B and that I have never been in a relationship with another guy, or even kissed one. It does lend to my credibility that I haven't been corrupted or whatnot. I could tell that with one person, me being in a previous relationship with a guy could have ruined some of the respect she had for my viewpoint (said person also kinda caused me to have a rant about singleness at Greg's small group last week in front of Steph Y and King. haha. Maybe i'll mention that later). But who I am, right now, is so vital to changing the most rigid perceptions of homosexuality in the evangelical Christian community.
Ultimately, I'd want people to share that I'm gay and celibate from same-sex relationships because I'm trusting in God to provide for me. Because He's already provided His Son for me and given me everything through His sacrifice, so how much more can He provide for me in this?
I'd like it to be talked about and used in that way. I'd love that.
Sometimes I wish I were Side-A, same-sex relationship affirming.
Not because I have some guy I want to be in a relationship with. But because I wish to teach other Christians how to love those who do affirm same-sex relationships. I want to show them so badly that, in actuality, not every person who has a different theology than you on homosexuality is automatically evil and driven by their desires.
This has never happened to my knowledge, but I would hate it if someone were to shun those who are Side A and then tout me as an example of how gay people should be. That would infuriate me to no end.
While that has never actually happened, I do sometimes get an inkling of it. That those exact actions and thoughts are going through that person's mind. I tend to give them the benefit of the doubt because heck, it's probably confusing for them too. But still.
Don't uphold Side B theology and then ostracize the LGBT community if people don't conform to it. Just because you've happened to find this nice little niche of people that secure your previous beliefs about homosexuality does not entitle you to go on your merry way of not getting to know and love your neighbors.
Don't share about me if you're just gonna leave it at, "Oh, what do I think about gay people? Well, I have a gay friend. He's Christian, gay, and celibate from same-sex relationships. I wish more gay people would be like him."
I remember once thinking about making a stipulation that people can share that I'm gay and Christian with anyone that they choose, but only under the condition that they leave out the part about being celibate from same-sex relationships, and if the person they're talking to want more details about how being gay and Christian works, well, ask me. I'm more than happy to talk.
But I do find myself saying I'm gay and Christian, and then immediately following up with, "But I'm celibate from same-sex relationships!" I don't want to "lose my credibility" by not following up with that. At the same time, maybe it's the sadist in me, but sometimes I want to just leave that part about being celibate out so I can watch people squirm as their beliefs and thoughts about interacting with gay people are challenged. And to see just how they'd react.
I've grown to think that this gay, celibate Christian is a stock thing that I can say in Christian communities and everyone's fine and goes along with it. But in Bolivia, a couple of people I told had serious issues with it. The fact that I even identify as gay they felt was not appropriate or good.
I suppose I am thankful in these cases that I am Side B and that I have never been in a relationship with another guy, or even kissed one. It does lend to my credibility that I haven't been corrupted or whatnot. I could tell that with one person, me being in a previous relationship with a guy could have ruined some of the respect she had for my viewpoint (said person also kinda caused me to have a rant about singleness at Greg's small group last week in front of Steph Y and King. haha. Maybe i'll mention that later). But who I am, right now, is so vital to changing the most rigid perceptions of homosexuality in the evangelical Christian community.
Ultimately, I'd want people to share that I'm gay and celibate from same-sex relationships because I'm trusting in God to provide for me. Because He's already provided His Son for me and given me everything through His sacrifice, so how much more can He provide for me in this?
I'd like it to be talked about and used in that way. I'd love that.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)